Monday, August 17, 2009

More than One Love




Can it be More Loving to Have More than One Love?

Polyamory Living as a polyamorous being, I find more love, both in my heart and in my day-to-day experience, than I ever did when I was keeping to emotional monogamy. (I would just like to say upfront that one can be polyamorous, and sexually monogamous.  The two are not mutually exclusive). Of course I did find love in my monogamous relationships, but in my experience, the very structure of monogamy ended up being counter to love. 
When you have subscribed to a monogamous form of relationship, making the right choice in a partner becomes extraordinarily important. After all, it’s a choice that you make, and then forsake all others in order to cleave unto that chosen one. You’d better get it right! So, potential partners are passed over because they don’t measure up to the status of “The One.”  You might find yourself thinking, Yes, I love this person. Yes, I am delighted to spend time with them. Yes, we might have a fulfilling relationship which lasts for the whole night, for days, weeks, months, years, but in my heart, I just can’t commit to loving them forever, or having children with them, or sharing a bank account with them (or whatever it is for you) therefore, I’d better say no now since I’ll probably find myself wanting to say no later. There is a tremendous irony in this. Monogamy is supposed to make it more likely that love will be present in our lives, and yet in many ways, it costs more love than it provides.

Here and Now If what I’m seeking is to love and be loved, well first I might consider where and when that is likely to happen. The only place that love can happen is here, and the time frame is now. The world would tell you that there is love which exists in the past, or the future, but it is impossible to love someone in the future, or the past, simply because you don't exist then, and neither does anyone real.  Love, real love, is a here and now phenomenon. I think Stephen Stills got it right when he suggested in a song, “Love The One You’re With.”  Granted we can feel love for the memory of a person from our past, or an imagined person in our future.  But it is usually a pale substitute for someone who is present, right now.  Then too, the wonderful thing about loving someone who is here, is you don't have to go looking for them, so the logistics have been worked out.

 

Lower your Standards and Find Romance
Since I have opened up to being poly I have had lovers that would have never come my way otherwise. Perhaps they had a different body type than I imagined my ideal partner would have, or had a funny voice, or maybe a lack of philosophical depth or perhaps we did not share the same goals in life. There are a seemingly endless number of criteria that we want in our “ideal” partner and most of us never find someone who measures up. We eventually come to some sort of compromise and make do with what we can get. That doesn't sound very romantic does it? I would venture to say that this spirit of compromise and taking what you can get, is the basis of far more relationships than “having found the ideal partner.” But as long as we cling to having found an “ideal partner” as the basis of a worthwhile relationship, we usually can’t help but feel that there is something missing and that we have settled for less than what could be. 

Oddly enough though, in this upside down and backwards world, making do with what you can get is romantic. When I separated myself from the story of “ideal partner” based relationship, I found that there was a spontaneous experience of love for the one sharing her time with me at the moment. Of course, that experience is always dynamic and changing. Sometimes it occurs as stronger or weaker, more or less exciting, but that’s just the nature of phenomenal experience. What happened is I let go of the thought that I knew what someone I could love looked like and opened to what was present in the moment. As long as you are holding out for someone who isn't here, romance doesn't have a chance.  Suddenly, through my allowance, my potential lover doesn’t have to rise to such a high standard. The wonderful thing about this, is that when you relax your standards, there is a far larger pool of potential lovers to choose from, Yea! Now I’m not suggesting that you give up on having what is truly important you in a partner. I am suggesting that you may find that your standards are naturally, more allowing if you aren’t going to be stuck with this person forever. You may even find yourself being more compassionate and generous about whom you share yourself with. There are countless thousands of us who feel deprived of loving, tender, contact with another. Just look around you. Maybe you’d be willing to share yourself more freely if there wasn’t an expectation that such sharing was only appropriate if you were heading to some form of special relationship. 

I was in a nine month long course one time, with a group of one hundred or so people, and we were having a discussion where people began to voice their dissatisfaction with how little sex they were getting. I looked around and noticed that there was a pretty equal balance of men and women in this group. What was the fucking problem? (pun intended). Of course the problem was these people were looking for sex with someone who wasn't there. That’s hopeless. It’s impossible to have sex with someone who isn't here. Have you noticed?

Special Relationships We have been taught that the secret to having a wonderful romantic relationship is to find someone who is really special, and who also thinks that we are really special, and then the two of us form a monogamous bond and have a really special relationship. This bond excludes all others. We even have words for this in our wedding ceremony. “Do you promise to cleave unto her/him, forsaking all others?” Of course, something in us quickly recognizes that this is doesn't make much sense. “You mean I’m supposed to forsake my friends, my parents, my children?” How could this be loving? 
While probably being well intentioned, this idea of having a special relationship is fundamentally flawed. In order for something to be special, it must first be separate. Well, what if separation is an illusion? I say that is the truth of it. Then if separation is an illusion, there is no such thing as a special relationship. Or, paradoxically, we could say that there is only one special relationship, and it is with everyone and everything. 
But just as a house built upon quicksand is destined to topple, a relationship built on the illusion of separation is destined to falter. Anything that lasts must have reality as its foundation. If you don’t want to accept this, that’s okay, but a relationship with separation as its foundation opting a very risky enterprise. Good luck! No wonder the domain of our romantic relationships is such a devastated wasteland.We were trying to create love out of separation, but that’s insane.

Obligated Love My report is that through practicing Polyamory I have learned to love on a deeper, more intimate, level than when I maintained monogamy. I can also tell you that having the freedom to feel openly attracted to or excited by another woman, leaves me feeling far more loved by my primary partner.She actually loves me enough to risk losing me. She does this because my having what I want is important to her. I feel the same way about her and offer her the same privileges. Now that’s loving… to say, “Honey, I love you so much that I want you to have what you want, even if it doesn't include me.” That’s holding someone with an open hand. My report is that introducing this level of freedom into your relationships, actually opens the space for love to be there. This love goes far deeper than possessively clinging to a form of love which seeks to protect itself and exclude others. 

One of the other wonderful side-benefits of this being present in my relationship(s) is that I don’t have to ever wonder if she (he) is here because she genuinely wants to be, or rather, she is here out of some sense of obligation and honor. How yucky is that? To know that your partner doesn't actually want to be with you at this time, they’re just honoring some obligation. If I had a prayer, it would be “God, spare me from obligated love.” It’s a farce. Obligated love is hypocritical. It is the homage that lies pay to the truth, that fear pays to love.

Pretense How many men could honestly say that being in love with their primary partner leaves them without any attraction to, or interest in other women? Granted you could probably find multitudes who are willing to suppress or hide the attraction they feel. My thinking is that they do this, primarily because they think they don’t have a choice in the matter. They want to continue with their lover and they know the rules. It takes courage to tell the truth, and take what you get. You have to be willing to lose.

Security That brings up another aspect of this idea. When you have more than one love in your life, you naturally feel more secure that love will continue to be in your life, because your experience of love is no longer dependent upon the whims of one particular person. If one of your lovers is feeling grumpy, or is putting in lots of extra hours at work, or even enjoying time with one of their other loves, you rest easier, knowing that there are other opportunities to get the connection and intimacy that you desire. We actually remove the scarcity principle and feel more peaceful as a result. 

Besides the effect upon you and your peace of mind, think of your lover. If you could cause her (him) to feel secure and content that love will be there in her life, whether you are there or not, then she will have more peace of mind. Isn’t that a gift worth giving? Isn’t that what we attempt to give with our promises of monogamy, the security that love will be there when you need it? You can easily imagine how your partner might feel far more relaxed about your occasional angst, or even absence, if she knew that this would not threaten her ability to have loving intimacy be present in her life. This could have a wonderful impact on the freedom and allowance she is willing to grant you. It’s easier to have space for another’s issues, if I know that those issues aren’t going to threaten my access to love and intimacy.

Conditional vs Unconditional Most of what passes for love these days, imposes expectations and conditions. Conditional "love" is not really love. Yes, I know that flies in the face of the romantic mythology on this planet, but I stand by the statement. Conditional love says, “I love you… unless you displease me.” Love says, “I love you… and there’s nothing you can do about it.” Conditional love is out to get something. Unconditional love is out to give something. Conditional love comes from a context of emptiness and lack. Love comes from fullness, and lack isn’t even on the radar. 

I knew this about love, a long time ago. That’s why I had this lingering uneasiness in my long-term committed relationships. The agreement was that she would love me, but if I ever found another woman more attractive than she, and she got wind of it, I was in trouble. If I ever acted on that attraction, it created the serious threat that I would lose the relationship.Somewhere inside me, I knew that this meant I wasn’t actually being loved. It was a negotiated settlement. What I wanted was to be close to her, approved of and accepted by her, and I was willing to sell out to get it.Two egos were attempting to get what they wanted from each other and a deal was struck, but love was not part of the bargain. Of course it wasn’t. Love wasn’t part of the bargain because the dirty little secret is that ego’s don’t love, they want something. Love is not a part of the ego’s job description. If you are dealing with an ego, it is insane to think that you will somehow be loved in the process. 

A human being seeking to find love is akin to a fish seeking to find water. It is not necessary to seek after love, when love is what you are. I’m speaking of you, the Being, beyond your identity. There is nothing you need to do to find love, because love is right here, right now. Love is what you are made out of. All that is necessary is to discover and unravel what it is that stands between you and the awareness of love. That’s it. Once you do that, you will know beyond the shadow of a doubt, that there is plenty of love in the world. There’s plenty of love for you. There’s plenty of love from you. There’s plenty of love for everyone you know. Love has forgotten no one.

Love is Like a Box of Chocolates My friend Andrea recently posed the question, “If you were given a box of chocolates, and these chocolates were easily a hundred times better than any other chocolates on the planet, would you hoard them and eat them all yourself? Or would you share them with others.” ‘Great question, huh? I will suggest that your answer to this question will be predictive of the love and happiness present in your life.

Love, does not Separate from Freedom  If someone I love comes to me and tells me that she has fallen in love with another, I get excited, literally. I get excited because I know what love is, and I want that for her, and I want it for the one that she is loving. While this may sound extraordinarily generous on my part, I have a trump card in my pocket. You see, I know that there is only one Being in the entire Cosmos: one Being, many faces. Separation is an illusion, but only all of it. It is a trick of the mind. It doesn’t exist in Reality. There is no one that my partner could withhold her love from, but me. There is no one that she could give her love to, but me. The only question is, do I want her love to flow freely or not? She gives her love to someone else, and I receive it. This is my direct experience, not some fluffy little air-headed theory. And if she should become so fascinated with her new love that she no longer spends time with me, so be it. I’ll be fine. She may be able to remove herself from my life but she cannot prevent my access to my Beloved. That would be impossible.
Feast or Famine With Love it’s either feast or famine. For one who loves, there is no shortage of love in the world. Have you noticed? And for one who doesn’t love, there is never enough love in the world. Their heart feels to them like a black hole which swallows up and renders meaningless, the love which comes their way. It can’t be otherwise, because love doesn’t come from outside, ever. 

I imagine that the most expanded experience of love you can have is where there is no limit or boundary upon your love. Everyone is welcome in your heart, and they are welcome in spite of whomever they may love. So, yes, my report is that having more loves is more loving, and my encouragement is that you test this out for yourself and see what you find, but only if you’re seriously committed to the truth, and to love.
~Carson Boyd

Thursday, August 6, 2009


It is possible to get really simple about what is going on, In any given moment, you are doing one of two things. You are either attaching to the present manifestation of reality (or some perceived lack in that manifestation) or you are surrendering that attachment and embracing what is arising now. ~ c a r s o n
Authenticity is the pinnacle of human character. Live from it, & you rise above the masses who would substitute lies for truth; fiction for reality. This world is being transformed by people, just like you who are saying, enough already. We stand on the edge of a dark abyss, and leap, empty handed, trusting that the truth will support us, and it does. Lies are unnecessary, but only the honest know this. ~carson

Sunday, August 2, 2009

Creature and Creator

The question occurred to me, one day, "Do I create the 'other' or do they create me?" I mean, it's obvious there's some creating going on; the way someone can look at you, and you know that they are seeing their own projection of who you are, not you. So, which is it? Am I creating you, or are you creating me?

A Course in Miracles says that the world you see is entirely your projection; it doesn't actually exist, except in a dream, that there is a submerged, unconscious guilt, within human beings; that we don't even know is there, most of the time, and it is so painful that we can't live in peace with it; so, in an attempt to alleviate ourselves of this guilt, we project it onto others. Why? So that they can be the guilty party, instead of us.

But again, how could it be that I am the projector of the seemingly exterior world, and that you are the projector of your seemingly exterior world, both? Oh, and your exterior world includes me, by the way. There is no logical answer to that one, yet I believe that it is an accurate statement. The answer is, that there is no you, nor me. What we refer to as "I" is a figment of imagination: an optical delusion of consciousness. There is only Awareness, projecting a dream and the identitieyou refer to when you say I is the dreamed, not not the dreamer. It is the Being underneath this identity which is the dreamer, and that being... well, there's only one of them, period, throughout every where, every when, and every "I." A being who's circumference is nowhere, and who's center is everywhere. It's a conundrum, as great truths are. Great truths are a conundrum because they contain thier opposites. We are both creator and creature of each other.

I used to be enrolled in the game of "Go out there and be somebody." That didn't work out too well. It never does. It may seem to work out, for awhile, but there is a big Nobody out there, just beyond all of your acheivements, waiting to claim you. And, one day, eventually, it will have its way with us.

"Resistance is futile. You will be assimilated into the Collective." --The Borg, (Star Trek, The Next Generation).

Now I'm content, even delighted, to be nobody: no one, with nothing to defend, no agenda. Just an interested being, watching and waiting to see what happens next.

~ c a r s o n